Well, I am depressed. Take the quiz.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I can kind of see it, especially if you "moosh" postmodern into it. But jeez, I thought I'd be more liberal. Plus, where does that 4% fundie come in? I thought the neo-orthodox bit might be higher too, but then I slammed Karl Barth on one of the questions so that probably knocked my neo-orthodox score down. (I share Bonhoeffer's critique of Barth, which is that, after you've taken such a strong position on the sovereignty of God, what else do you really have to say?
As to the description, I wouldn't say that I think tradition and ecclesial authority is hugely important--a simple "important" will do here, with the caveat that a person ought to be ready to flout ecclesiastical authority should the situation call for it. I don't recall ever saying that Mary was the Mother of God on this quiz, although I do, actually, believe that. When Mary became de rigeur among my fellow protestants, I moved on to take a greater interest in Mary Magdalene, Jesus' girlfriend.
Thanks, John, for the link. I tested out highest at Emergent/Postmodern-82% with Roman Catholic a close second at 79%. You've got a bit more Evangelical Holiness/Wesleyan in you than I do, but we're pretty close on the liberal categories. For some reason, I peg 39% on the Charismatic/Pentecostal meter. Maybe it's because I'm in contact with Pentecostals on a regular basis here. Or I'm just beginning to get in touch with my inner Holy Roller.
Posted by: Dan Hays | April 02, 2008 at 01:57 PM
I took the quiz and posted it over at my blog . . . who knew I was a Holiness guy?
Posted by: Chris | April 02, 2008 at 02:16 PM
My two highs were RC and postmodern, which, I got to thinking later, kind of made sense. If you "mooshed" an RC and a postmodern, you might very well get a Lutheran.
Chris, I had that weird "holiness" thing going on too--a bit less than you, but still pretty high.
Interesting that none of us liberals were all that liberal theologically. A Catholic bishop friend of mine once described himself as "a theological conservative and a social justice liberal." I can identify with that.
Posted by: John Petty | April 02, 2008 at 08:28 PM
I had the same order as you except I had classical liberal above modern liberal, and I was slightly higher (79%) on both Catholic and postmodern. I agree that Lutheran makes sense as a cross between postmodern and Catholic.
I was curious about your answer to this question:
"Bishop Spong is an important theologian who should be taken seriously"
I had to disagree with that, not because I think he's an arch-heretic, but because I just don't think he's an important theologian. In fact, I'm not even sure I'd call him a theologian. He strikes me more as...I want to say something like social activist, but that's not right...I think maybe the best way to describe him is as an evangelist, much as that would irk his detractors.
Anyway, if I recall correctly, you're a fan, right? So I was curious to hear what you thought.
Posted by: Andy | April 02, 2008 at 10:53 PM
I think I said, "Agree slightly." I don't think he's a major theologian, but I could go with something like "teacher." Frankly, Spong mostly says what I learned in seminary. He just doesn't fudge about it like the rest of us do.
Posted by: John Petty | April 03, 2008 at 12:10 AM