« Doesn't he know that's just "political pandering"? | Main | Why did I ever think Rachel Maddow was smart? »

May 29, 2008

Comments

Hypatia

I was thinking about the McGovern precedent, but it occurred to me that Obama will have something McGovern didn’t – the support of the Democratic establishment, which seemingly couldn’t wait for an alternative to Clinton once it became apparent that Obama wasn’t just a flash in the pan. He has old-politics connections through his wife. Also, am I correct in thinking that Obama’s press is far better than McGovern’s ever was? (And I have the impression that Obama is the more formidable candidate - which also could be wrong.)

John Petty

Oh, Obama is definitely a better candidate than McGovern. I don't have anything against McGovern, incidentally. He just wasn't a particularly good candidate.

My point is that the "left-liberal insurgency" in the Democratic Party is quite good at caucuses, but that caucuses are not representative of opinion in the party.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Lectionary Posts